Go to Blogger edit html and find these sentences.Now replace these sentences with your own descriptions.This theme is Bloggerized by NewBloggerThemes.com.
Go to Blogger edit html and find these sentences.Now replace these sentences with your own descriptions.This theme is Bloggerized by NewBloggerThemes.com.
Go to Blogger edit html and find these sentences.Now replace these sentences with your own descriptions.This theme is Bloggerized by NewBloggerThemes.com.
Go to Blogger edit html and find these sentences.Now replace these sentences with your own descriptions.This theme is Bloggerized by NewBloggerThemes.com.
Go to Blogger edit html and find these sentences.Now replace these sentences with your own descriptions.This theme is Bloggerized by NewBloggerThemes.com.
For their 231st episode, two decadent film critics, two old sport dads, and partying school teachers, Will Johnson and Don Shanahan, finally have, for what seems like the first time in a while, found a movie they truly feel opposite on to a nearly hate vs. love level, and it might not be from a place you typically expect. The loaded argument in question surrounds Baz Luhrmann's sparkly and loud blockbuster adaptation of The Great Gatsby. Between these two guys, who've read this book as students and now teachers, find out who takes what side. Come learn more and stay for the mutual love and respect that fun movies encapsulate. Enjoy our podcast!
Cinephile Hissy Fit is an Astra Award-losing Film Obsessive media podcast, brought to you by the Ruminations Radio Network, and a member of the Critics Choice Podcast Network. Please visit, rate, review and subscribe. If you enjoyed this show, we have more where that came from, with interesting hosts, and wonderful guests. All are available on iTunes, Spotify, and anywhere you find your favorite shows. Follow the show on Twitter at @CinephileFit and on Facebook. Also, find both Will Johnson and Don Shanahan on Letterboxd as they accumulate their viewings and build their ranks and lists. Lastly, check out their TeePublic store for merchandise options from stickers to t-shirts!
Thank you so much for your captive audience and social media participation! Enjoy our new podcast episode!
As things stand, the truth is obvious. This marketing strategy does not revolve around just one regular trailer. Rather, it includes four trailers that focus on individual characters while keeping more extensive clips under wraps. The Marvel and Disney websites have mentioned Joe and Anthony Russo as directors and December 18, 2026, as the release date. Stephen McFeely is listed as the writer by Disney. Robert Downey Jr. has returned officially, but as Doctor Doom, not Tony Stark. That makes the Avengers: Doomsday trailer discussion feel less like hype and more like assembly before impact.
That choice explains the current mood around the movie. Fans have pieces, but not the full machine. At Slots Dynamite, movie-themed slots let players chase jackpots for free. The same logic fits Marvel's rollout, because it keeps feeding curiosity with controlled reveals. Reuters reported that a first full trailer played for theater owners at CinemaCon in April. So, the Avengers: Doomsday trailer already exists in a bigger form, just not for everyone yet.
Avengers: Doomsday teaser rollout already shows Marvel's new playbook
The Avengers: Doomsday teaser campaign already says plenty about tone. The first teaser was released on December 23, which saw the return of Chris Evans as Captain America. The second teaser was released on December 30, focusing mainly on Thor. The third teaser that was released on January 6 teased the return of various X-Men characters such as Professor X, Magneto, and Cyclops. The fourth teaser, released on January 13, featured Wakanda, Namor, and the Fantastic Four.
This explains why this marketing campaign feels particularly well thought out. According to IGN, the director of the film, Joe Russo, referred to these elements as "narrative information" rather than just marketing noise. He pointed out that each element is a part of a larger narrative. The reason behind this is because the movie is giving away its plot in small fragments.
Avengers: Doomsday cast reveals a collision, not just a reunion
The Avengers: Doomsday cast looks closer to an event map than a normal ensemble. Marvel and Disney officially list Chris Hemsworth, Anthony Mackie, Sebastian Stan, Letitia Wright, Paul Rudd, Tom Hiddleston, and Simu Liu. They also list Pedro Pascal, Vanessa Kirby, Joseph Quinn, and Ebon Moss-Bachrach. Then come Patrick Stewart, Ian McKellen, Alan Cumming, James Marsden, Rebecca Romijn, and Channing Tatum. Chris Evans is now on Disney's official cast list too.
Such an expansion brings about changes regarding scale right away. It is not yet another collaboration amongst familiar members of the Avengers cast. According to Reuters, it is the first Marvel movie that includes both the Avengers and X-Men casts together. The livestream announcement was referred to as bringing back familiar faces along with some newer ones by Variety.
This is important because Marvel has long been expanding its ensemble more quickly than its core. Doomsday seems like the solution to this problem. Thor has the gravitas of the traditional Avengers. Sam Wilson represents the modern Captain America franchise. The Fantastic Four represent the new core. The X-Men addition adds a new level of significance. Rarely has an MCU film held this much weight.
Avengers: Doomsday plot stays hidden, but the shape is already visible
The real Avengers: Doomsday plot is still being protected very carefully. There is very little that can be gleaned about the plot from Marvel’s website for this movie. This fact was not an accident. Instead, it draws attention to the issue of where characters belong, rather than why. Yet, there is a common thread amongst all these articles.
Steve Rogers cannot be forgotten through nostalgia alone. This is why the Marvel teaser starts with him returning. He is still the strongest example of a leader in the Avengers team. Downey's turn as Doom serves as the complete opposite. One character stands for memory while the other stands for change.
Even before the previews hint at a crash movie instead of a one-place siege. Captain America is back. Thor is making his move. There are the X-Men on screen. There’s Wakanda, Namor, and the Fantastic Four, already in motion. As Reuters said, Avengers and X-Men come together for the first time in this Marvel movie. That makes the next Avengers: Doomsday trailer crucial, because it must explain scale without giving away the spine.
When is Avengers: Doomsday coming out and why that answer changed
The question of when is Avengers: Doomsday coming out became messier after Marvel changed the schedule. The old Marvel article still uses May 1, 2026, while the newer Marvel and Disney's movies article use December 18, 2026. Reuters also reports the latter date after CinemaCon. The release schedule is no longer a mystery, but the promotional campaign remains unclear.
The process of production becomes another piece of evidence. Marvel had revealed that the production of the movie had started while doing the long live stream reveal. This is an old production note that still holds the original date from May 2026. The new release date in December implies that more time will be available for post-production and marketing purposes.
That move says something important about the marketing rhythm. A December launch gives Marvel more room for staged reveals. It also creates a direct box office clash with Dune: Part Three. A major Avengers: Doomsday trailer would make sense closer to that final stretch. Until then, Marvel can keep selling mystery, scale, and the return of legacy faces.
Avengers: Doomsday leaks are part of the story now
That is exactly why Avengers: Doomsday leaks have become their own side show. IGN reported that copyright takedowns hit what appeared to be leaked early footage online. It also demonstrated how rapidly unofficial postings would disappear from various sites. This void provides an incentive to repost, edit, and lose any contextual understanding. The outcome is a chaotic news stream in which rumor outruns fact.
For this reason, any analysis of the movie will begin with official information alone. Marvel Studios has officially released details about the directors, writers, date of release, and principal cast members. They have also officially announced Steve Rogers, Thor, X-Men, Wakanda, and Fantastic Four tie-ins using teasers. All other information is yet to be penciled in. The final Avengers: Doomsday trailer will need to separate signal from noise very quickly.
A safe assumption would not be an info dump. Marvel has built this campaign on the concept of partial vision. Every teaser was centered on a different side, a different emotion, and a different part of the chessboard. A teaser for the audience should probably continue with that approach. It can show the outline of the battle without having to explain the whole game.
The entire marketing campaign, if viewed from a holistic perspective, does carry a clear message, and that is, Marvel is not only offering surprise but convergence. The movie seems to be crafted to be a solution as well as an attraction. The movie manages to integrate legacy superheroes, their respective replacements, mutants, and Fantastic Four all within one lane. This is quite a grand statement.
In a world filled with numerous detective shows, Unforgettable's intriguing concept truly makes it unforgettable. It tells the story of Carrie Wells, a former police detective with the rare ability to remember almost everything she has done in her life with perfect accuracy: hyperthymesia. Her mind retains conversations, faces, locations, and events in extraordinary detail, and she is an exceptionally good investigator as a result.
This rare skill will serve as the backbone of the series and provide a different perspective on a story-type crime procedural. Carrie does not always need to rely on physical evidence or gut feelings to solve cases; it is often the details she can't remember that suddenly come together in her mind. The idea makes the reader think and gives the story emotional depth. The series, available on Prime Video, blends mystery, emotional storylines, and investigative drama, keeping the audience hooked from one episode to the next.
Strong Performances: Tell the Story!
One of Unforgettable's greatest assets is its cast. From start to finish, Poppy Montgomery effectively portrays Carrie Wells as intelligent, emotional, and determined. Carrie is a smart investigator, but her perfect memory also costs her, as she can't forget anything bad that has happened to her or anything traumatic in her past. The character's emotional travails make her feel more realistic and relatable, even with her superpowers. Even though Carrie seems superhuman, she often feels emotionally isolated because of her vivid memory.
Poppy Montgomery and Detective Al Burns (Dylan Walsh) have a chemistry that's another highlight of the series. The show's complex backstory enhances the drama of its investigations and adds a personal dimension to the program beyond its weekly crime cases. There is also effective use of supporting characters who add humor, loyalty, and warmth, making the investigative team believable and engaging.
The Perfect Blend of Mystery and Emotion
If you're looking for action or violence, many crime dramas have plenty, but not Unforgettable. Although the episodes are always filled with suspenseful investigations and deadly criminals, the series also examines relationships, emotional trauma, and personal growth as well. While Carrie's memory helps her solve tougher cases, it also means she has to re-live her past many times. The emotional battle is among the most captivating parts of the show. Her mind's power of memory gives her a depth of psychology that is not traditionally seen in a standard detective novel.
The show also features long-term storylines that unfold slowly over the course of the seasons. One of the most heartache-filled storylines is Carrie's quest for the answers to her sister's murder. This perpetual enigma adds extra emotional heft to the series and leads viewers beyond the individual episodes. This mix of procedural story and personal drama makes Unforgettable interesting to both mystery fans and character-driven story fans.
The fast-paced investigations keep the viewers engaged
Pacing is another key factor in Unforgettable's effectiveness. Episodes are fast-paced and hold viewers' attention without being confusing or complicated. The suspects, motives, and unexpected plot turns are constantly fresh, keeping the reader guessing throughout each case. Carrie’s memory is sometimes the key to picking up on small details that other investigators overlook. It’s fun to watch her recreate scenes from a conversation, a crime, or something she missed. The audience is given a glimpse into the workings of her mind, setting her apart from other detective dramas.
It's also impressive that a procedural crime show doesn’t repeat itself. Carrie’s skills always open new avenues for solving cases, and the character dynamics as a whole keep changing from season to season. From a single episode to binge-watching the entire season on Prime Video, the narrative is engaging and easy to follow.
A Stylish and Atmospheric Viewing Experience
Unforgettable is presented visually in a polished, professional manner, which helps build the series's suspenseful mood. The New York City backdrop adds energy and realism, lending an authentic urban feel to the investigations. The setting is designed to evoke a dramatic experience for the detectives, whether on the streets or in the stressful atmosphere of an interrogation room.
Memory flashbacks are also used well in the show. The viewer is taken through visual recreations, which help explain how Carrie's extraordinary memory works, whenever she can remember something from the past. The sequences are interesting not only for visuals, but more importantly, to understand how Carrie solves cases. Whereas darker crime dramas tend to be more graphic and contain a lot of violence, Unforgettable is more about the psychological tension and the emotional narrative. It makes the series easier to watch for those who just want a little suspense without too much violence.
The cinematography is clean, the soundtrack is emotional, and the performances are solid, making the film look and sound polished and emotive.
This is why fans of crime dramas will enjoy the unforgettable
People who enjoy series such as Castle, The Mentalist, and Criminal Minds will probably enjoy Unforgettable for its intelligent investigation and intense emotional narrative. But the show's core memory idea makes it stand out. Carrie Wells is not just any ordinary detective solving crimes, but her amazing memory is altering the very way the investigations are conducted. It also makes her character more complex and emotional, as she remembers everything.
A mix of mystery, drama, suspense, and emotional storytelling makes the series an interesting watch for the general audience. From the plot of a detective mystery to the romance between the two protagonists to the psychological drama, Unforgettable has it all.
A fast-paced story:
This underrated Prime Video series is really worth watching. In sum, This Underrated Prime Video series is truly a must-watch. While there are a plethora of crime dramas out there that follow the same format, Unforgettable works well on a number of levels, thanks to clever ideas, emotional narratives, etc. Carrie Wells' amazing memory is a great investigative asset, but the show does not lose sight of the emotional toll of that talent.
The show has been highly successful, with well-done performances, a fast-paced story, and some emotional development of characters. It's thought-provoking without being all violence, and it never slows down investigations to provide emotional depth. If you're looking for an underrated TV show on Prime Video based on the detective genre, Unforgettable is a good choice. The show has elements of great mystery, strong characters, and a compelling concept that set it apart from typical procedural dramas.
Disclaimer: This article may contain affiliate links, and we may earn a commission if you make a purchase through these links
Hollywood has always had a complicated love affair with catastrophe. From the slow-building dread of a storm system gathering on the horizon to the explosive chaos of a natural disaster in full swing, disaster films are among the most reliable fixtures of mainstream cinema. They are thrilling, they are dramatic, and — when they are made well — they are also surprisingly instructive.
The best disaster films are not just spectacle. They are studies in preparation, response, and the gap between what people assume will happen and what actually does. And if you look carefully, many of the lessons they dramatise on screen apply directly to how homeowners manage the real, unglamorous risks that surround their properties every day.
The Day After Tomorrow: When You Ignore the Warning Signs
Roland Emmerich's 2004 climate disaster epic is not subtle about its central thesis. The catastrophic storms, flash freezes and weather events that devastate the Northern Hemisphere in the film are the culmination of warning signs that were identified, documented, and systematically ignored by the people who had the power to act on them.
The parallel to property management is uncomfortably direct. Dead trees, storm-damaged shrubs, overgrown vegetation pressing against structures, and root systems undermining drainage are all warning signs that homeowners identify, note, and — far too often — decide to deal with later. Later, in the disaster film and in residential property management alike, has a way of becoming an emergency.
The lesson of The Day After Tomorrow is not to wait for the weather event to force your hand. Proactive management of hazardous vegetation — including emergency shrub removal of overgrown or storm-damaged plants that are pressing against structures, blocking drainage, or creating fire hazards — is the difference between managing a situation on your own terms and responding to one that has already escalated beyond your control.
Twister: Respect for Forces You Cannot Control
Jan de Bont's 1996 storm-chasing thriller is exhilarating precisely because it takes its central force seriously. The tornado is not a villain. It is a natural phenomenon of extraordinary power, and the characters who survive the film are the ones who understand the difference between studying that power and underestimating it.
Storm damage to residential properties follows a similar dynamic. The wind does not distinguish between a well-maintained yard and a neglected one when it arrives. But the property that goes into a storm with structurally sound trees, cleared drainage channels, and managed vegetation around the structure consistently sustains less damage and recovers faster than one that was already compromised before the first gust arrived.
Twister’s lesson for homeowners is a simple one: respect the forces you cannot control by controlling what you can. A pre-storm property assessment, clearing of hazardous vegetation, and management of trees and shrubs near structures are the preparations that the film’s survivors would recognise immediately.
The Impossible: The Cost of Being Unprepared
J.A. Bayona’s 2012 film, based on the true story of a family caught in the 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami, is less a disaster spectacle than a survival drama of extraordinary emotional intensity. What makes it so devastating is how completely the catastrophe dismantles the ordinary life around it. Hotels, gardens, roads, structures — everything that was part of a functioning world becomes debris in minutes.
The film is not about preparation in the practical sense. No amount of property management would have mitigated a tsunami of that scale. But it is about the aftermath — the long, painstaking process of clearing, rebuilding, and restoring what the disaster left behind. And it is in the aftermath that the condition of the surrounding environment before the event becomes critically important.
Properties with well-maintained grounds, cleared vegetation, and managed trees and shrubs around structures have significantly less secondary debris to deal with after a storm event. The primary damage from wind, water, or falling material is compounded in neglected properties by the secondary damage from vegetation that was already weakened, overgrown, or poorly positioned before the event arrived.
Signs: The Lesson Hidden in Plain Sight
M. Night Shyamalan’s 2002 film is not, strictly speaking, a natural disaster film. But its central mechanism — a family that has surrounded itself with clues about the crisis approaching and cannot quite see what those clues are telling them — applies to property management with uncanny precision.
The signs that a tree or shrub is becoming a hazard are almost always visible before the hazard materialises. Fungal growth at the base of a trunk. A lean that has gradually increased. Branches that are dying back from the tips. Root heaving in the soil around a large shrub. Vegetation pressing against gutters, foundations, or exterior walls. These are signs, in the Shyamalan sense — information that is present and readable for anyone who knows what to look for and is willing to act on what they see.
The homeowners who avoid emergency callouts are not luckier than the ones who need them. They are simply the ones who read the signs earlier and responded before the situation forced their hand.
San Andreas: The Importance of a Rapid, Professional Response
Brad Peyton’s 2015 earthquake disaster film is not interested in subtlety, but it is very interested in speed. Dwayne Johnson’s rescue helicopter pilot is effective precisely because he knows what a professional response looks like and he executes it without hesitation. The civilians who fare worst in the film are the ones who freeze, delay, or attempt to manage a situation that requires professional capability they do not have.
Emergency property situations — a tree on a roof, a shrub undermining a foundation, storm damage to vegetation that is now pressing against a structure or blocking access — follow the same logic. The homeowner who calls a certified professional immediately, who does not attempt to manage the situation with tools and approaches unsuited to the scale of the problem, consistently achieves a better outcome than one who delays or improvises.
San Andreas’ lesson is the one that emergency service professionals in every field will recognise: rapid, expert response saves what slow, amateur response cannot.
What These Films Are Really Teaching Us
Disaster films, at their best, are not really about the disaster. They are about human behaviour in the face of overwhelming force — the choices people make, the preparations they did or did not put in place, the responses they execute under pressure, and the relationships that sustain them through the aftermath.
The property management lessons they encode are not their primary purpose, but they are genuinely there. Prepare before the event. Manage the warning signs when they are still manageable. Respect the forces you cannot control by controlling what you can. Call the right professionals when the situation exceeds your own capabilities. And do not wait for the disaster to make the decision for you.
The best disaster films end with survivors, not heroes. The survivors are almost always the ones who made better decisions earlier. That is the lesson that transfers directly from the screen to the yard, the garden, and the property surrounding your home.
Whether you are dealing with overgrown vegetation, storm-damaged trees, or shrubs that have become a structural concern, the time to act is before the next weather event arrives — not after it. Professional assessment, proactive management, and rapid expert response when it is needed are the real-world equivalent of the preparation that keeps the survivors in disaster films alive.
The final hand of Casino Royale runs for nearly 10 minutes. Four players remain. The pot exceeds $100 million. Daniel Craig's Bond holds a straight flush, and the camera moves between faces, chip stacks, and the five community cards on the felt. None of it is realistic poker. The hand sequence would occur roughly once in several billion deals. The scene works anyway because the filmmaking converts a card game into a compression chamber for character, stakes, and confrontation.
How Poker Functions as a Dramatic Device
A poker hand has a built-in dramatic structure. The deal establishes the premise. Each betting round raises the tension. The reveal resolves it. Screenwriters use that framework because it compresses conflict into a single physical space with fixed rules and escalating risk. Two characters sitting across a table with chips between them can express power, vulnerability, deception, and resolve without leaving the room.
The mechanics also generate visual rhythm. Close-ups on hands and faces alternate with wide shots of the table. Sound design isolates the click of chips, the snap of cards, the silence between bets. Directors use these elements the way a composer uses rests and crescendos. The game provides the tempo. The filmmaker controls the volume.
Card Games on Screen and Off the Table
Texas Hold'em dominates competitive poker broadcasts, but film has used many variants to build dramatic tension. Five-card draw appeared in westerns for decades before Hold'em became the standard. Omaha and Stud show up in underground game sequences where the rules themselves carry narrative weight. Audiences who play texas holdem recognize the betting rounds and community card structure that filmmakers use to time reveals and escalate confrontation across a single hand.
Other card games serve similar cinematic functions. Blackjack drives the plot of 21. Baccarat carries the early Bond films. Each game supplies its own rhythm for building suspense.
The Cincinnati Kid and the Template It Set
The 1965 film built its entire third act around a single stud poker hand between Steve McQueen's Kid and Edward G. Robinson's Lancey Howard. The hand runs through multiple streets with dialogue layered between bets. Each raise communicates something about the character's confidence, desperation, or calculation.
The film established conventions that poker movies still follow. The veteran opponent, the young challenger, the crowded room watching in silence, the final card that determines everything. These elements became the template. Rounders, Molly's Game, and Casino Royale all use variations of the same architecture, updated with different stakes and settings but built on the same dramatic bones.
Rounders and the Poker Boom Connection
Matt Damon's 1998 film depicted underground poker in New York City with a specificity that no previous film had attempted. The hands were plausible. The dialogue used real poker terminology. The culture of grinding, bankroll management, and table selection informed the plot rather than serving as decoration.
The final scene between Damon's Mike McDermott and John Malkovich's Teddy KGB condenses the entire film's tension into a single session. McDermott identifies a physical tell involving Oreo cookies and uses it to read his opponent's hand strength. The scene works because it dramatizes the skill component of poker through observation rather than luck.
Rounders reached a wider audience during the 2003 poker boom, when Chris Moneymaker's WSOP Main Event win brought millions of new players to the game. The film became required viewing in that community. Its depiction of poker as a skill-based pursuit played by serious people with real consequences aligned with what new players were discovering at the table. The timing was incidental, but the film's accuracy made it durable.
Casino Royale and the Spectacle Approach
The 2006 Bond film replaced baccarat, the franchise's traditional card game, with Texas Hold'em. The switch reflected the game's dominance in popular culture at the time. The poker sequence lasts roughly 30 minutes and centers a $150 million buy-in tournament at the Casino Royale in Montenegro.
The hands played in the film are statistically extreme. Four players at the final table hold a flush, a full house, a higher full house, and a straight flush. That combination is functionally impossible in a dealt hand. The filmmakers prioritized visual escalation over accuracy. Each reveal tops the last. The audience follows the drama through the reactions rather than the math. For a movie that needs the scene to carry geopolitical stakes, believability comes from performance, not probability.
Molly's Game and the View from Behind the Table
Aaron Sorkin's 2017 film told the story from the organizer's perspective rather than a player's. Jessica Chastain's Molly Bloom runs high-stakes games attended by celebrities, athletes, and financiers. The poker is secondary to the business around it, which inverts the usual formula. The game becomes a setting rather than a plot mechanism.
The film drew from Bloom's memoir and the real events that led to federal charges against her. The players at her tables included names that became public through court filings. The poker scenes show community cards and bet sizing accurately enough for knowledgeable viewers to follow, but the camera spends more time on the money moving through the room than on the hands being played.
Why Accuracy Matters Less Than Structure
Poker players routinely point out the implausible hands dealt in poker films. The criticism misses the function of the scene. A film does not need to depict a statistically likely outcome. It needs to build and resolve tension within the constraints of the scene's runtime.
The Sting used a rigged poker game to establish Robert Redford's con artist credentials in under 5 minutes of screen time. Maverick played the same structure as comedy. Cool Hand Luke used a bluff with nothing to define Paul Newman's entire character. Each film treated the cards as secondary to the human moment they framed.
The best poker scenes succeed because they use the game's structure as a framework for character conflict. The cards are props. The bets are dialogue. The river card is a plot twist. Filmmakers who understand this produce scenes that work for audiences who have never held a hand of cards and for players who have logged thousands of hours at the table. The mechanics are flexible enough to serve both.
What the Game Gives the Camera
Poker is one of the few competitive activities that takes place across a single table, at a pace the camera can follow, with visual elements that communicate conflict without narration. A chess match communicates through the board, which most viewers cannot read. A boxing match communicates through movement, which is intuitive but fast. Poker gives the camera faces, chips, cards, and silence. The filmmaker controls the reveal. That control is what makes it a durable source material for scenes that hold attention at any budget level. A $200 million Bond film and a low-budget indie can both put two characters at a poker table and produce tension. The game scales to the story. The story scales to the filmmaker's ability to use what the game already provides.
Released: 8 May 2026 Director: Kyle Balda Starring: Hugh Jackman, Nicholas Braun, Julia-Louis Dreyfus, Chris O’Dowd, Bryan Cranston, Molly Gordon, Hong Chau, Patrick Stewart, Emma Thompson Leoni Swann’s 2005 novel Three Bags Full combined a story of a flock of sheep, whose shepherd read them bedtime stories with a murder mystery. When the shepherd, George […]
Released: 1 May 2026 Director: Damian McCarthy Starring: Adam Scott Damian McCarthy certainly knows a thing or two about sequential discovery. Ever since he first garnered the goodwill of the horror community with Caveat and Oddity, the Irish genre artisan has made a name for himself with an eerily modern spin on vintage folk horror. […]
