MOVIE REVIEW: Coyote vs. Acme

Images courtesy of Warner Bros. Animation and Ketchup Entertainment

COYOTE VS. ACME— 4 STARS

From the opening scene through every second of Coyote vs. Acme, one of the film's most masterful aspects is the impeccable merging of live-action subjects and settings with traditional hand-drawn animation. Like the magic of Robert Zemeckis’s classic Who Framed Roger Rabbit? achieved two generations ago to enhance, accentuate, but not take over a movie screen like the green-screen CGI slop of today, the performance choreography of the cast and the deft on-the-move framing of The Naked Gun cinematographer Brandon Trost create complete visual believability. Now, on its own, that level of craft is a cute optical stunt, but Oscar-nominated May December screenwriter Samy Burch and Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles: Out of the Shadows director Dave Green (how’s that for a curveball creative combination, by the way) didn’t stop there.

LESSON #1: PLACING THE ILLOGICAL WITHIN THE LOGICAL— From a world-building and storytelling standpoint in Coyote vs. Acme, the real immersive trick in matching Zemeckis before them is how everything corporeal and everything drawn occupy the same world with no one batting an eye. Cartoon characters and humans share common living spaces, workplaces, resources, citizenship, and more with complete side-by-side acceptance. Ingeniously, Coyote vs. Acme has placed the illogical within the logical seamlessly and made it the norm. 

From there, with that confident grasp, Burch and Green can tell any kind of story they want with the classic cast of Looney Tunes characters, and we’ll gladly follow the newfangled and enlivened ride. Sure enough, they have a doozy of a story for us that simultaneously slaps our knees with humor and our faces with a silly and sobering dose of topical social commentary. The result is one of the most flat-out entertaining and endlessly clever movies of recent memory.

Coyote vs. Acme centers on Wily E. Coyote’s lifelong quest to catch his deliciously prized Road Runner. Since 1949’s Fast and Furry-ous (for a treat, see the original chase in three parts here, here, and here), and through 48 other short films, Wily has endured an eternal run of painful failures. Over the years, many of his best-laid plans—sketched on elaborate blueprints and sorted into a vast bank of file cabinets in his home cave—have involved trying out several inventive products from the Acme Corporation, led by CEO Foghorn Leghorn. No product has ever worked properly, and they too have piled up in his cavernous domicile.  

LESSON #2: GET YOURSELF A LAWYER— Stewing after another failure, Coyote sees a TV ad from the Albuquerque, New Mexico law firm Avery, Jones, and Maltese. Their lead attorney, Kevin Avery (MacGruber himself, Will Forte, playing the redemptive schlub to perfection), is calling for any individuals out there who have been wronged by any of the myriad of mail-order products from Acme to come forward and get the legal representation and restitution they deserve. Without the usual literal lightbulb dinging over his head (but we know it’s there), Wily E. Coyote sees this as a new and unique opportunity to catch the Road Runner, not on the highways and byways of the American Southwest, but stopped and seated on a future witness stand. Putting a spotlight on the faults of Acme is merely a bonus.

LESSON #3: THERE’S PROBABLY SOMEONE TO BLAME— The sheer size of Wily E. Coyote’s case as a “high usage user” of Acme products overwhelms Kevin Avery, who’s used to smaller and simpler settlements. Spurred on by his legal assistant niece Paige (Lana Condor of the To All the Boys film series), Kevin’s firm gets locked into a David vs. Goliath legal battle against Acme chief legal counsel, Buddy Crane, an old rival of Kevin’s, played with a delightfully evil sheen by wrestler-turned-movie-star John Cena. The blame game is on between Kevin, trying to cite a causal connection between Acme product failures, and Crane’s implications that Wily’s actions are reckless and ensuing injuries are self-inflicted. Naturally, plenty of madcap hijinks and daring physical comedy ensue where Coyote vs. Acme is not solely bound to the courtroom. 

LESSON #4: WATCH OUT FOR THE MEGACORPORATIONS— Dramatic irony exists in Coyote vs. Acme of clearly knowing the good guys from the bad guys very early on. As a narrative vessel to create cameo supporting roles for the Merrie Melodies gang of Bugs Bunny, Daffy Duck, Tweety Bird, the Tasmanian Devil, and even deeper character cuts, a background subplot is slowly being revealed of corporate secrets at the defendant megacorporation of innovation—born from humble beginnings as a cartoon anvil company before branching out to create all the best and most popular products on the human side of the economic marketplace. Their nefarious success came from the exploitation and dangerous research-and-development experimentation on the seen-as-inferior cartoons first. 

LESSON #5: TO STOP TRYING OR KEEP TRYING?— Using those parallel allusions, not all that uncommon to corporate greed seen in life beyond the red curtain that opens and closes a Looney Tunes episode, Coyote vs. Acme has a search for truth that will elicit some winking nods from the knowing adults in the crowd. Playing from Kevin and Wily’s underdog side of things, there is an underlying message between times to stop trying or keep trying, and whether one or the other choice is wise or a type of defeat. That type of smartness to rub some chins will also, in a very positive and proactive manner, rub some content-centered and consumer-focused children the right and, hopefully, mindful way. Prodding those kinds of values next to good, old-fashioned slapstick fun is an absolute win for a family film. 

Movies similar to Coyote v. Acme - powered by Film Dilemma

LOGO DESIGNED BY MEENTS ILLUSTRATED (#1423)

Permalink

from Review Blog https://ift.tt/9VuHdkp

Share:

Read More

How Video Conferencing Makes International Film Collaboration Easier

by Nancy Fernandez

The film industry has always been built around collaboration. Directors, actors, producers, writers, editors, cinematographers, and other professionals often need to work closely together to bring a story to life. However, when these professionals are located in different countries, coordinating a production can become complicated. Travel, time differences, scheduling conflicts, and communication barriers can slow down the creative process.

Fortunately, modern communication technology has made international collaboration much easier. Filmmakers can now communicate, share ideas, review projects, and make important decisions without always being in the same physical location. This has created new opportunities for production companies to work with international talent and develop projects across borders.

Connecting Global Film Teams

One of the biggest advantages of online communication is that it allows film teams to stay connected regardless of their location. A director in Los Angeles can communicate with a producer in London, a cinematographer in Mumbai, and an editor in Seoul without requiring everyone to travel.

Video Conferencing Products make these interactions more convenient by allowing teams to communicate face-to-face through live video meetings. Instead of relying entirely on emails or text messages, filmmakers can discuss creative ideas in real time, ask questions, and receive immediate feedback. This makes communication more personal and efficient.

Simplifying Pre-Production Meetings

Pre-production involves numerous discussions and decisions. Teams need to review scripts, develop concepts, plan locations, organize schedules, and coordinate budgets before cameras start rolling.

International teams can use online meetings to handle many of these responsibilities remotely. Directors can discuss the visual style of a project with cinematographers, while producers can coordinate with department heads in different countries.

Regular virtual meetings can also help everyone stay updated as the project develops. Instead of waiting for an in-person meeting, team members can quickly connect whenever an important decision needs to be made.

Supporting Remote Auditions

Casting international talent can be challenging when actors and production teams are located thousands of miles apart. Traditional auditions may require actors to travel to a particular city, which can increase costs and limit the number of people who can participate.

Virtual auditions provide a practical alternative. Casting directors can conduct initial interviews and auditions remotely, allowing them to consider a wider range of performers. Directors can also communicate directly with actors and provide instructions during the audition process.

Although final auditions or screen tests may still require in-person sessions, remote meetings can significantly reduce the time and cost involved in the early stages of casting.

Improving Creative Collaboration

Film production involves constant creative discussion. Directors may want to change a scene, producers may suggest adjustments, and writers may need to explain specific elements of a script.

Online video meetings allow these conversations to happen in real time. Participants can share presentations, scripts, storyboards, reference images, and other materials while discussing them together.

This is especially useful when a project involves creative professionals from different cultural backgrounds. Team members can explain their ideas directly, reducing the possibility of misunderstandings caused by written communication.

Making Post-Production More Flexible

International collaboration doesn't stop when filming ends. Post-production can involve editors, visual effects artists, sound designers, composers, and colorists working from different locations.

A director can join an editing review remotely and provide feedback while the editor works on a project. Producers can also participate in review sessions without traveling to an editing studio.

This flexibility allows filmmakers to work with specialists based anywhere in the world. A production company doesn't necessarily have to limit its choices to professionals located nearby.

Reducing Travel and Production Costs

International film projects can involve significant travel expenses. Flights, hotels, transportation, and other costs can quickly increase a production budget.

Remote meetings can reduce the need for unnecessary travel. Producers can attend planning sessions virtually, while directors and other creative professionals can participate in discussions without leaving their current locations.

This doesn't eliminate the need for physical meetings, especially during filming, but it allows production teams to reserve travel for situations where face-to-face collaboration is genuinely necessary.

Overcoming Time Zone Challenges

International teams often work across multiple time zones. A meeting that is convenient for someone in Europe may occur very early or late for someone in Asia or North America.

Scheduling tools and recorded meetings can help solve this problem. Teams can establish regular meeting windows that work reasonably well for everyone and record important sessions for members who cannot attend.

Clear communication about deadlines and responsibilities is also essential when team members are working at different times of the day.

Building Stronger International Partnerships

Video communication can help production companies build long-term relationships with international partners. Producers can maintain regular contact with studios, distributors, creative agencies, and freelancers without requiring frequent business trips.

Consistent communication can strengthen professional relationships and make it easier to identify future collaboration opportunities. Over time, these connections can lead to international co-productions and broader creative partnerships.

Maintaining Security and Professionalism

While remote collaboration offers many advantages, film companies must also consider security. Scripts, unreleased footage, production plans, and financial information can be highly confidential.

Teams should use trusted communication platforms, secure file-sharing systems, strong passwords, and appropriate access controls. Establishing clear guidelines for sharing sensitive information can help protect valuable creative assets.

Conclusion

Video conferencing has become an important tool for modern international film collaboration. It helps teams communicate across borders, conduct remote auditions, coordinate pre-production, review creative work, and manage post-production more efficiently.

While physical collaboration will always remain essential to filmmaking, remote communication provides flexibility that was difficult to achieve in the past. By combining in-person production with digital collaboration, filmmakers can access global talent, reduce unnecessary travel, and create stronger international partnerships.

As technology continues to evolve, international film teams will have even more opportunities to collaborate creatively, regardless of where their members are located.

Permalink

from Review Blog https://ift.tt/zCNgvZA

Share:

Read More

The End Of Oak Street ★★

Released: 14 August 2026 Director: David Robert Mitchell Starring: Anne Hathaway, Ewan McGregor, Maisy Stella, Christian Convery, Jordan Alexa Davis & P.J. Byrne Aside from Dr Ian Malcolm’s most famous line, “Life finds a way” from Jurassic Park, his other famous quote also rings true for David Robert Mitchell’s The End of Oak Street: “Your […]

The post The End Of Oak Street ★★ appeared first on Movie Marker.

from Movie Marker https://ift.tt/5Ro0HAw

Share:

Read More

Repetition Is Cinema’s Most Underrated Storytelling Tool

Repetition can look like the enemy of storytelling. Movies are expected to move and surprise, while recurring actions appear to hold them in place. Yet filmmakers use repetition to sharpen attention. Once an audience understands the pattern, the smallest alteration gains dramatic weight.

A repeated day can expose personal growth. A musical phrase can become an argument. A domestic routine can conceal something horrifying.

Repetition Establishes the Rules

A recurring image or sound teaches the audience how a film operates. The first appearance supplies information; the second establishes a pattern; the third creates an expectation.

Every round in payid pokies follows a recognisable sequence of reel movement, symbol reveals and sound cues. Because this sequence remains consistent, a different combination or bonus animation becomes noticeable immediately.

Cinema uses a less rigid version of this principle, allowing a pattern to develop across a scene or the entire narrative.

Repetition normally performs three tasks:

• It introduces an action, location or sound.

• It encourages the audience to anticipate its return.

• It alters one detail that changes the pattern’s meaning.

A moved object, missing sound or delayed action becomes significant because the film has established what belongs there.

One Device Can Perform Several Jobs

Repetition does not require a literal time loop. A director can repeat a route, musical passage, camera position or household task.

Each recurrence makes the next alteration easier to notice.

Small Changes Redirect the Story

Tom Tykwer’s Run Lola Run gives Lola 20 minutes to find 100,000 Deutsche Marks and save Manni. The 80-minute film presents three versions of her journey, each shaped by slight differences in timing.

A moment on the staircase affects when Lola reaches the street. That difference changes her encounters with a cyclist, a bank employee and a passing car. Still photographs show possible futures for minor characters, revealing how a brief collision can redirect a life.

The recognisable route allows the audience to compare versions without additional explanation.

Failure Becomes a Training Sequence

In Doug Liman’s Edge of Tomorrow, Major William Cage repeatedly dies during a disastrous beach assault and wakes at the military base before the operation. The loop turns failure into knowledge.

Editor James Herbert does not show every attempt in full. Repeated lines, movements and deaths initially work as markers, then disappear as Cage becomes more experienced. Complete sequences contract into decisions he has already learned to make.

Cage’s repeated meetings with Rita Vrataski also give their relationship a history that only he remembers, turning tactical progress into isolation.

Rhythm Can Carry an Argument

Whiplash repeats time without rewinding it. Andrew Neiman plays the same passages until tempo, endurance and approval become inseparable. Damien Chazelle frames practice as conflict.

Terence Fletcher’s demand to decide whether Andrew is rushing or dragging turns a technical question into psychological pressure. The drumbeats recur, but their meaning changes with every interruption. Blood on the kit makes the damage visible.

During the final performance of “Caravan,” Andrew repeats musical ideas by choice. The rhythm that confined him becomes his source of authority.

Architecture Can Repeat the Past

Stanley Kubrick makes the Overlook Hotel feel trapped in recurrence throughout The Shining. Danny Torrance’s tricycle follows similar routes through corridors, with its wheels moving between carpet and wooden flooring. The alternating sound creates a pattern before any figure appears.

The Grady twins, geometric designs and similar doors make the building appear capable of reproducing its history. Room 237 becomes unsettling partly because it interrupts a familiar route.

Kubrick’s symmetrical compositions turn repetition into a feature of the architecture.

Routine Can Conceal Horror

Jonathan Glazer takes a colder approach in The Zone of Interest. Rudolf Höss and his family eat meals, tend the garden and discuss household plans beside Auschwitz. Their routines continue while machinery, gunshots, barking dogs and distant screams remain audible beyond the wall.

Sound designer Johnnie Burn created an acoustic world that rarely changes enough to interrupt the family’s behavior. A Sight and Sound analysis published by the BFI describes the camp as heard but barely seen, with its violence pushed towards the edge of the family’s attention.

The film won the Academy Award for Best Sound in 2024. Its impact comes through noises the characters have chosen to ignore.

Routine Makes Disruption Visible

Chantal Akerman’s Jeanne Dielman, 23 quai du Commerce, 1080 Bruxelles devotes much of its 201-minute running time to domestic work. Jeanne peels potatoes, prepares meals, folds clothes and cleans the apartment with controlled precision.

Akerman uses fixed camera positions, allowing each task to unfold without conventional emphasis. Once those actions have been repeated, minor errors become alarming. Potatoes are overcooked, a button is left undone and dinner is prepared at the wrong time.

In 2022, the film became the first work directed by a woman to lead Sight and Sound’s decennial critics’ poll.

The Pattern Is Only Half the Story

Effective repetition always creates a second question: what has changed? Phil Connors hears the same song in Groundhog Day but becomes a different person. Lola follows the same route but reaches another future. Andrew repeats a rhythm until ownership of it changes hands.

The recurring detail creates a baseline, while the alteration supplies the story. Once the pattern is familiar, moving a chair or missing a beat can carry the force of a plot twist.

Permalink

from Review Blog https://ift.tt/hUAx61i

Share:

Read More

Best Sports Movies That Still Feel Inspiring Today

Photo by Luisa Frassier on Unsplash

Sports movies work because they are rarely only about the game. The best ones use competition as a frame for discipline, pressure, friendship, failure, and comeback stories. Whether the sport is boxing, baseball, football, racing, or basketball, a strong sports film gives the audience a reason to care before the final score arrives.

Character Before the Final Score

Rocky remains one of the clearest examples. The film is remembered for training montages and the final fight, but its lasting power comes from the character study behind the boxing. Rocky Balboa is not chasing fame as much as self-respect. That makes the movie easy to revisit, even for viewers who are not boxing fans.

Remember the Titans is another classic because it balances football with a larger human story. The games matter, but the film is really about trust, leadership, and a team learning to work together under pressure. It shows why sports can become a powerful setting for stories about identity and community.

A Smarter Kind of Underdog Story

Moneyball takes a different approach. Instead of focusing on a heroic athlete, it follows the people trying to rethink how a team is built. The film turns data, scouting, and front-office decisions into a tense underdog story. For modern sports fans, that makes it especially interesting, because analytics now shape nearly every professional league.

Small Teams, Big Stakes

Hoosiers is a reminder that small-scale stories can feel just as dramatic as major championships. Its appeal comes from the rhythm of a local team, a demanding coach, and a community that slowly begins to believe. The film understands that sports are often emotional because they belong to a place, not just to the athletes.

Different Paths Through Sport

The Blind Side, Creed, Ford v Ferrari, Miracle, and Coach Carter all show different sides of the genre. Some focus on mentorship, some on personal reinvention, and others on obsession, teamwork, or the cost of winning. What connects them is the sense that sport reveals character faster than ordinary life does.

Sports Fandom Beyond the Screen

This is also why sports entertainment has grown far beyond the cinema screen. Fans now follow highlights, live statistics, documentaries, fantasy leagues, and mobile platforms in the same daily routine. Some viewers who enjoy sports stories also track real matches through services such as melbet apk download when they want mobile access to scores, odds, and match coverage.

Why These Films Still Work

A good sports movie does not need to surprise the audience with the result. Many of these films follow familiar patterns: the team struggles, the coach demands more, the athlete doubts himself, and the final challenge arrives. The reason they still work is that the emotional journey feels earned.

The best sports films make effort visible. They show the quiet practices, the difficult conversations, and the moments when confidence has to be rebuilt. That is why movies like Rocky, Moneyball, Remember the Titans, and Miracle continue to connect with new audiences. They are not just stories about winning. They are stories about why people keep playing.

Permalink

from Review Blog https://ift.tt/K23nRNS

Share:

Read More

Pictureville Cinema Announces UK Premieres/ New Cinerama Prints For Widescreen Weekend Film Festival’s 30th Anniversary

The National Science and Media Museum’s Pictureville Cinema has loaned two rare three-strip Cinerama prints from Hollywood’s Cinerama Dome, including How the West was Won (1962) and This is Cinerama (1952). Produced in 2002 from the original camera negatives, the prints are in exceptional condition and represent a significant enhancement to Pictureville’s existing Cinerama programme. As the world’s only […]

The post Pictureville Cinema Announces UK Premieres/ New Cinerama Prints For Widescreen Weekend Film Festival’s 30th Anniversary appeared first on Movie Marker.

from Movie Marker https://ift.tt/c7pKWUJ

Share:

Read More

How Movies Have Changed the Way We Think About Luck, Winning and Entertainment

Nobody sat us down and taught us what luck is. We picked it up in the dark, mostly, watching somebody else's fortune turn on a screen. The lottery ticket left as a tip. The underdog who has no business winning and wins anyway. The gambler who should walk away and doesn't. A century of cinema has done more to shape how ordinary people think about chance than any statistics class ever will, and it did the job so quietly that most of us never noticed the lesson going in.

Worth noticing now, though. Because when you actually line up the films we remember about luck, a strange thing happens: almost none of them believe in it.

What the Classics Really Say About Chance

Start with The Sting. Fifty years on, the 1973 caper is still the con-artist picture every other one gets measured against, and its attitude to luck is borderline contemptuous. Paul Newman and Robert Redford win big — but nothing about the win is fortunate. The card game is rigged, the horse results are fake, the entire betting parlor is a stage set built for an audience of one. What reads as luck from the outside is preparation all the way down. That's not a gambling lesson. That's a life lesson wearing a fedora.

Martin Scorsese's Casino argues the other side, and argues it hard. Ace Rothstein is the sharpest handicapper in Las Vegas, a man so good at removing chance from his work that the casino hands him the keys. It saves him from nothing. The one variable he can't price — people, specifically the two he loves and trusts — takes everything anyway. De Niro plays a man who beat the odds and lost to life. Audiences understood the difference.

And then there's the coin toss. Anton Chigurh in a dusty Texas gas station, No Country for Old Men, asking a shop owner to call it. "You need to call it. I can't call it for you." No stakes named, no explanation offered. It might be the most unsettling two minutes about chance ever filmed, because it strips away every comfort we attach to the idea. Woody Allen got at the same thing far more gently in Match Point: a tennis ball clips the net cord, hangs, and could drop on either side. The whole film falls out of which way it lands.

Even the crowd-pleasers are sneakier than they look. Slumdog Millionaire appears to be a fantasy about a boy getting lucky on a quiz show — except the script spends its entire runtime proving the opposite, that every answer was bought years earlier with hard experience. Rocky, the most famous against-the-odds story Hollywood ever produced, ends with Rocky losing the fight. Going the distance was the win. Stallone knew exactly what he was doing there — ask ten people how the film ends and half will swear Rocky took the belt. He didn't. Then came Uncut Gems in 2019, for anybody who still needed the warning label. The Safdie brothers wedge the camera inside a compulsive bettor's skull and hold it there for two hours, every scene wound a notch tighter than the one before. Show that film to a teenager and you can skip the lecture.

Put those films in a row and the pattern is hard to miss. Cinema's verdict on luck is oddly consistent, almost stubborn about it: chance is real, but character decides what it means. The movies made us literate in luck. Skeptical, even.

From the Big Screen to the Living Room

While all that was sinking in, the way we consume entertainment quietly changed underneath us. Theatrical windows shrank. Streaming became the default. Movie night used to mean going somewhere; now it means the couch, the remote, a phone within arm's reach, and somebody pausing the film mid-scene to argue about where it's all headed.

A small change, on the surface. Underneath it, the old wall between watching and doing was coming down. A cinema audience sits still and stays quiet. A living-room audience talks back. It votes in polls during reality shows, second-screens the plot holes, drifts between the TV and a dozen interactive things on the nearest device. Once entertainment turned participatory, the appetite for participation only grew.

The Quiet Comeback of Social Play

Follow that appetite and you end up somewhere unexpected: the games table. Board game cafés keep opening in cities that hadn't seen one in decades. Pub quiz night still packs rooms every week. Tabletop gaming had a renaissance nobody saw coming; escape rooms became the default birthday plan for a certain kind of friend group. After years of solitary scrolling — and a pandemic that reminded everybody what isolation actually costs — people wanted games played with someone again.

Bingo might be the strangest comeback of the lot, since it's the pastime everyone had already written the obituary for. Instead it reinvented itself twice. Once as a night out, with events like Bongo's Bingo turning the game into part rave, part stand-up show. And again online, where chat rooms rebuilt the sociability of the old halls for players who might live two hundred miles apart. The draw is the same one the quiz nights tap: low stakes, shared attention, and that small theatrical jolt of chance the movies trained us to enjoy. It's the Match Point tennis ball in miniature. A number gets called, and for one second anything is possible.

Choosing Entertainment the Way the Movies Taught Us

Here's the part nobody expects: the film lessons turn out to be practical. Watch The Sting twice and you stop taking glittering promises at face value. Sit through Casino even once and you come away certain the house did its homework, whether or not you did yours. That kind of skepticism is portable. It needs to be, now that so much social play happens online — and no, not every platform out there deserves the trust it's asking for.

Choosing a bingo platform deserves the same critical eye people bring to choosing a film. Licensing, reputation, fair terms and the overall experience matter far more than whichever promotion is shouting the loudest. Sites like TheBingoOnline do for licensed bingo platforms roughly what a trusted critic does for a Friday night — comparing trust, transparency and player experience so readers can see past the trailer. Newman and Redford had this figured out in 1973. Know the game before you sit down at the table. Never mistake marketing for luck.

The movies supplied the other half of the lesson too, and it's the half that counts. Uncut Gems and The Gambler are both, at bottom, two-hour arguments for limits — chance is only entertainment when you can afford either outcome. Play it that way, with a budget and a clock, and a game of chance stays what it was in the best films. Drama. Not danger.

The Final Reel

So what did a hundred years of cinema actually leave us with? A double-edged education. Rocky taught us winning isn't always the point. The Sting taught us fortune favors the prepared. Casino taught us no system beats life, and a coin toss in a Texas gas station taught us chance deserves our respect. Those stories shaped how a modern audience plays every bit as much as how it watches.

Next time a number gets called at quiz night, or a dice roll settles a board game, or a bingo card sits one square shy of a full house — that flutter you feel was partly authored in a screening room. Every movie has a lesson. On the subject of luck, the lesson took: enjoy the moment chance hangs in the air, and like all the best protagonists, know exactly what you're playing for.

Permalink

from Review Blog https://ift.tt/HBhswyC

Share:

Read More